Ich sehe nur ein Argument: Der Abstand zur Bande, der Genfer wird "in die Bande" gecheckt, kann man als Bandencheck ansehen, man müsste aber schon den Video sehen. Denke die Kombination von harter Check, Abstand zur Bande und Wirkung hat zu diesem Entscheid geführt.
RULE 119 – BOARDING
DEFINITION:
A player who bodychecks, elbows, charges, or trips an opponent in such a manner that causes the opponent to be thrown violently into the boards.
i. A boarding penalty is punishable by at least a minor penalty.
ii. A player who injures or recklessly endangers an opponent as a result of boarding will be assessed either a major and game-misconduct penalty or a match penalty.
iii. “Rolling” an opponent in possession of the puck along the boards who is trying to squeeze by a player is not considered boarding.
Quelle:http://www.iihf.com
Denke es läuft auf die Verletzung raus!